Childbearing: A Reflection of Changing Family Values: The Case of Married One-Child or Childless Men and Women in Karaj

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Cultural Sociology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD student in Sociology - Iranian Social Issues, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the transformation of the meaning of childbearing within the context of changing family values. In this regard, the study also investigates the gap between the ideal number of children and couples’ actual childbearing behavior. Although having few children is not considered desirable in Iranian society, the decline in fertility rates below the replacement level indicates a growing tendency toward having only one child or remaining childless among Iranian families.
This research adopts a qualitative approach using descriptive phenomenology. The participants were selected through purposive sampling, and data were collected via semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 14 married men and women residing in the city of Karaj.
The findings reveal that participants lived experiences demonstrate a transformation in the semantic patterns associated with childbearing compared to the traditional cultural and familial background of Iranian society. From their perspective, decisions regarding childbearing are increasingly shaped by factors such as the expansion of virtual spaces and changes in relationship and parenting patterns; rethinking the meaning of childbearing; perfectionism; environmental concerns; social instability; individualism; anxiety over marital instability and the responsibilities of parenthood; bodily and health-related issues; lack of family and societal support for childbearing; changes in parenting styles; the gap between economic realities and expectations; and the stigmatization of large families.
Based on the results, the childbearing experience among families may be labeld as “conscious childbearing”, the outcome of which often manifests as one-child families or childlessness. The participants consider not only the role of personal and familial conditions in their decision-making but also the demands of modern life and the surrounding environmental context.

Keywords


Ahern, K. (1999). “Ten tips for reflexive bracketing”. Qualitative Health Research, 9(3), 407-411.
Ahmadzadeh Tori N, Sharif-Nia H, Ghaffari F, Behmanesh F, & Pourreza Ab (2023). Effective factors on voluntary childlessness and one-child tendency from couples’ perspective: Compulsory childlessness
Ajzen, I., & M. Fishbein (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Anaja Kos, Vlasta Novak Zabukovec & Vesna Jug ( 2025). “The role of eco-anxiety in reproductive wish during emerging adulthood”, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2025.2508875.
 Barari, M. (2023). Mixed Methods Research | Definition, Guide & Examples. gstatgroup.   Retrieved October 4, 2023, from https://gstatgroup.com/methodology/mixed-methods-research/
Beck, U & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and
 its Social and Political Consequence. London: SAGE Publications.
Brown, H. C. (2024). “Young People Are Worried About Climate Change—and That’s Affecting Their Future Plans”, from
Chandola. T., Colema, D.A. & Horns, R.W. (1999). “Recent European Fertility Patern: Fiting Curresto distorted distributions”, Population Studies ,3-53:317-329.
Gearing, R. (2004). “Bracketing in research: A typology”. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1429-1452.
Gouni, O., J.¯ unait˙ e-Fedosejeva, G., Kömürcü Akik, B.; Holopainen, A., & Calleja-Agius, J.  (2022). “Childlessness: Concept Analysis”. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1464.
Lesthaeghe, R. & Surkyn, J. (2012). When history moves on: foundations and diffusion of a second demographic transition, in: Jayakody, R., Thorton, A., Axinn, W. (eds.) international family change: ideational perspectives mahwah nj: lawrence erlbaum and associates.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). “The unfolding story of the second demographic transition”‚ Population and Development Review, 36 (2), 211-251.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2020). “The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation—a global update”‚ Genus‚76 (10)‚ 1-38.
Shosha, G. A. (2012). “Employment of  Colaizzi's strategy in descriptive phenomenology: A reflection of a  researcher”. European Scientific Journal, 8(27), 31-43.
Skutina T.V., Volkova O.V., Kalinovskaia K.S., Potapova E.V., Judina Ju.G (2024). Value and motivational prerequisites and subjective grounds for women’s voluntary childlessness. In: J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Humanit. soc. sci., 2024, 17(11), 2054–2064. EDN: HGIONG.
Speziale, H.J., & Carpenter, D.R. (2007). Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative, (4th ed.). Philadelphia. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.
Testa, M. R. (2012). “Childbearing Preferences and Family Size in Europe: Evidence from the 2011 Eurobarometer survey”, European Demographic Research Paper, No.1, Vienna Institute of Demography of the Austrian Academy of sciences.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). “Europe’s second demographic transition”. Population Bulletin, 42 (1),1-59.
Volume 18, Issue 4
Winter 2025
Pages 81-104

  • Receive Date 22 February 2025
  • Revise Date 01 September 2025
  • Accept Date 29 September 2025
  • First Publish Date 29 September 2025
  • Publish Date 19 February 2025