A Sociological Analysis of the Causal Pathways Leading to Different Patterns of Suicide Attempt Behavior among At-Risk Adolescents in Mashhad

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD candidate in Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran. Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Background and aim: Suicide attempts among adolescents are a multidimensional phenomenon that cannot be explained solely by individual factors and require attention to familial and social contexts. This study aimed to identify the causal configurations affecting different types of suicide attempt behaviors among adolescents in Mashhad.
Data and method: This study was conducted using a mixed-methods approach, employing qualitative content analysis and qualitative comparative analysis based on Boolean algebra. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 61 adolescents aged 15 to 18 years who had experienced non-fatal suicide attempts. Participants were selected through purposive sampling and based on the principle of maximum variation.
Findings: The findings revealed four main types of suicide attempts, including “escape from suffering,” “impulsive-reactive,” “protest-communicative,” and “existential.” Dysfunctional family relationships were the central causal condition across all types. In the escape from suffering type, the simultaneous presence of structural family breakdown, social isolation, and environmental pressures played a determining role. The impulsive-reactive type emerged in families with relative cohesion but harmful emotional relationships. The existential type was explained by structural loneliness and a crisis of meaning, while the protest-communicative type was explained by the lack of legitimate channels for expressing protest and environmental pressures.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that family dysfunction, in interaction with weak intermediary and support institutions, places adolescents in a cycle of suffering and structural impasse, shaping different pathways to suicide attempts. Therefore, effective prevention requires interventions beyond the individual level, based on strengthening families and developing social and support networks.

Keywords


Abbas, M. J., Mohanna, M. A., Diab, T. A., Chikoore, M., & Wang, M. (2018). Why suicide? The analysis of motives for self-harm. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 46(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135246581700042X
Abrutyn, S., & Mueller, A. S. (2014). Are suicidal behaviors contagious in adolescence? Using longitudinal data to examine suicide suggestion. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413519445
Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Suicide as escape from self. Psychological Review, 97(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.90
Bearman, P. S. (1991). The social structure of suicide. Sociological Forum, 6(3), 501–524. https://www.jstor.org/stable/684516
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Douglas, J. D. (1968). The social meanings of suicide. Princeton University Press.
Giddens, A. (1966). A typology of suicide. European Journal of Sociology, 7(2), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600001442
Iran Open Data. (2024). Suicide is rising sharply in Iran. https://iranopendata.org/en/article/290-suicide-is-rising-sharply-in-iran/
Joiner, T. E. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press.
Klonsky, E. D., & May, A. M. (2016). The three-step theory (3ST): A new theory of suicide rooted in the “ideation-to-action” framework. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 8(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2015.8.2.114
Lester, D. (2019). Theories of suicide: Past, present, and future. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Manning, J. (2012). Suicide as social control. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01305.x
Martin, J., LaCroix, J. M., Novak, L. A., & Ghahramanlou-Holloway, M. (2019). Typologies of suicide: A critical literature review. Archives of Suicide Research, 23(4), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2018.1564100
O’Connor, R. C., & Kirtley, J. A. (2018). The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1754), 20170268. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0268
Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
Rihoux, B., & De Meur, G. (2009). Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 33–68). SAGE Publications.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569.n3
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
Shneidman, E. S. (1993). Suicide as psychache. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181(3), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199303000-00001
World Health Organization. (2025, February). Suicide. World Health Organization Fact Sheets. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide
Volume 20, Issue 1
Summer 2026
Pages 14-37

  • Receive Date 13 June 2026
  • Accept Date 31 July 2026
  • First Publish Date 08 August 2026
  • Publish Date 24 September 2026